| The term cognizable means capable of being known, | | | | procedural capacity through cognized a posteriori |
| and cognition in general concerns everything that can | | | | knowledge from the other individuals before him/her; |
| be thought and known by the individual. Thus, | | | | from the causalities they were faced with during their |
| everything written during the relatively short history | | | | existence. By for example learning how by identifying |
| of humankind are cognizable, as it is often a posteriori | | | | oneself with obstacle seeking behavior, one may |
| knowledge and knowledge produced by humans with | | | | become biased to not to seek alternatives to reach |
| relatively similar neurocognitive capacities, and can | | | | the goals, but instead seeks always why he/she |
| hence be used to extend one's procedural capacity. | | | | cannot reach them, and how instead by identifying |
| But pre-deterministic choices of fate must contain a | | | | oneself with the obstacle resolving behavior one |
| priori information, as the term a priori roughly means | | | | learns to seek to cognize techniques for resolving |
| knowledge before experience. By studying the | | | | obstacles, and thus reaches his/her goals by knowing |
| experience of those who have already been in the | | | | what information should be cognized in |
| desired circumstances, one may cognize a posteriori | | | | pre-deterministic sense, making the choices the |
| knowledge that can prove to be vital for avoiding | | | | estimated future presents, possible. Hence this is how |
| mistakes and for the ability to make excellent | | | | knowing the past makes predicting the future |
| choices, but what is a posteriori for another individual | | | | possible, and while literacy offers a posteriori |
| B, but a priori for the individual A, even though | | | | experience from the short term past of humanity, |
| shared, it remains as a priori information for the | | | | extending the procedural capacity of the constructive |
| individual A before the path of cause and effect | | | | memory systems, for example, all experiences are |
| enable it to transform into a posteriori information. | | | | new for the individual him/herself. |
| For example biases are in most cases, if not always a | | | | Present time advances rapidly in relativity with the |
| priori information that has mistakenly been cognized | | | | infinite possibilities, and their infinite combinations, |
| as a posteriori information. | | | | including the possibilities the cognitive procedural |
| Throughout the individual's life, choices determine the | | | | capacity is not able to grasp and perceive. Infinite |
| path of life. Spiritual path of life is produced of | | | | variety and their infinite combinations, all sides related |
| conducting spiritual choices of actions and responses, | | | | to issues, are beyond any individual's capacity to |
| learned as a priori information from the religious | | | | grasp, and can hence transcend the human mind into |
| texts, wherein economic path of life is in the most | | | | a loop of only studying them, replacing the life in the |
| common case in the causalities of earning enough | | | | present with variety studying behavior. Such studies |
| revenue to live the life of one's choosing outside the | | | | do increase the procedural capacity, but when |
| economic path of life and the time invested to it. By | | | | causalities advance rapidly, a choice and the choices |
| pre-deterministic valuations of what choices of | | | | that follow that choice, may well close before one's |
| actions the individual will be faced with in the future, | | | | very eyes, and the fate to spend one's life in such a |
| and the more accurate those valuations are, the | | | | waiting room before the existence's side of life turns |
| more such fates become to be of one's choosing. | | | | back to nothingness, becomes a reality, and is hence |
| Again, it is hard if not impossible to predict future | | | | a choice not wisely taken, since to work is to |
| cognitions in a priori, but estimating the category and | | | | achieve. In the opposite side, when societies |
| type, such as wisdom, teachings of the spiritual path | | | | suppress knowledge from their individuals, they inhibit |
| of causalities, and knowledge about the economic | | | | the freedom of cognition and thus choosing fates in |
| contemporary constancies, one extends his/her | | | | unitial level, and even in spiritual level. |