Freedom From Stupidity

Paul has been talking about our freedom in Christ,of conscience -- I do not mean your conscience, but
that in Christ people are free from superstition andhis. For why should my liberty be determined by
godless cultural practices. He began this section insomeone else's conscience?" (1 Corinthians 10:28-29).
chapter eight talking about various food prohibitionsWe may ask why we should not be free to express
and practices as an example of Christian freedom. Heour freedom in Christ any way we please. God is
had elsewhere discussed the fact that Christians aresovereign, Christ is Lord, and Christians are free in
free from the Old Testament food laws. Here heChrist. All of these things are true. However, said
showed that Christians are also free from paganPaul, "Let no one seek his own good, but the good
food practices.of his neighbor" (1 Corinthians 10:24). This hearkens
What made the Old Testament food laws bindingback to Jesus admonition in Matthew 20:25-28: "You
was the power of God. And what freed people fromknow that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over
those Old Testament food laws was the power ofthem, and their great ones exercise authority over
Christ. Here he argues that only God has spiritualthem. It shall not be so among you. But whoever
power, and God has given all spiritual authority andwould be great among you must be your servant,
power to Jesus Christ (Matthew 28:18). Therefore,and whoever would be first among you must be
the pagan gods have no power. Their sacrifices andyour slave, even as the Son of Man came not to be
ceremonies have no consequences, and so whateverserved but to serve."
power was thought to be transmitted to food thatHaving children provides this same lesson. Before
had been sacrificed to idols was nonexistent becausethey have children parents are free to do all sorts of
false gods had no power to begin with.things for their own benefit and pleasure. But when
Therefore, Christians could eat food that had beenchildren are in the home, some things must be
sacrificed or dedicated to pagan idols because theycurtailed -- not because they are wrong, not because
knew that there was no spiritual power associatedthey are forbidden or unlawful, but because children
with such food. Pagan idols were dead and powerlessare prone to mimic behaviors they see without
to do anything. So, there was no danger or threatdiscernment. "Monkey see, monkey do," as the old
from such idols or from anything associated withadage goes. Children learn by imitation, so adults need
them.to do only those things that will not be abused or
And yet Paul did make a case against eating foodmisused by those who are less discerning.
that had been sacrificed or dedicated to idols thatChristians are free to eat whatever is available at the
was based, not on the power of pagan idols, but onmarket without concerns about propriety, morality or
the weakness of Christian brothers. Paul had arguedconscience. Because pagan rituals have no spiritual
that practicing radical Christian freedom in thepower there is no spiritual danger from pagan ritual
presence of weaker Christians, Christians who did notfoods. But if someone makes a point about the fact
fully or correctly take their own weaknesses intothat the food is associated with pagan rituals, if
consideration, could result in the overestimation ofsomeone brings it up, if someone points it out to
their own strength, their own ability to resist the pullyou, then there is another concern.
of their old pagan habits, and lead them back into sin.This new concern is not about the food, or your
Therefore it was incumbent upon the more maturefreedom to eat whatever you want, but about the
Christians to model faithfulness in such a way as notperson who brought up the concern. If it was not an
to lead other Christians astray. It was an argument,issue for that person, he would not have brought it
not based on Christian freedom, but based onup. So, if the concern is raised, it is a real concern.
Christian responsibility to one's weaker, less matureAnd it is incumbent upon the more mature Christian
brothers and sisters. Of course Christians are free,to set an example that will not be misinterpreted by
but we are also responsible to God and for onethe less mature Christian, or by the person who has
another.yet to confess Christ as Lord. At this point, the issue
"'All things are lawful,' but not all things are helpful. 'Allis not the food or the power of pagan gods, but
things are lawful,' but not all things build up'" (1service to a fellow or potential Christian. Our
Corinthians 10:23). Lawful is a correct translation ofobligation to be of service to others trumps our
the Greek, but in this context it means permissible.freedom in Christ to do what pleases us.
Paul was saying that while all things are permitted,Paul has delineated an important principle here, that
not all permitted things are helpful, not all permittedthe controlling conscience among Christians is the
things contribute to Christian growth and maturity.weaker conscience, or we could say the more
Sometimes some things that are permitted should besensitive conscience. We should think of it as setting
avoided, if not for our own sake then for the sakea good example. But let's not forget that while we
of others.want to set a good example, we must not forget or
Paul goes on, "if someone says to you, 'This hasneglect the greater responsibility to teach our children
been offered in sacrifice,' then do not eat it, for thehow to discern good and evil in the light of Christ for
sake of the one who informed you, and for the sakethemselves.