Defining Good and Evil

There are good people everywhere, but how do wetaxi follows the driver's instructions. Where, however,
define good? Pope Sixtus IV loved Tomas dedoes the intention come from? Is it an ineffable soul
Torquemada (arguably the most evil man that hasforce that precipitates action, is it karma? The
ever lived)! Good and evil seem entwined withgenesis of that intention and force is an interesting
society's expectations. Behavior can be considereddebate among the religions.
good by some, bad by others, and volumes areAll intention, or plotting, be it for "good or evil," can
written on this subject by philosophers and thebe seen to be a result of cause and effect, or
religious regarding whether good and evil exists as ankarma. In turn, cause and effect could be seen as
entity. Since good and evil seem to change in thethe mother of all action, and when action results in an
context of various cultures, religions, andillusion of a self performing it, that is; an entity
circumstances, how do we get to the root of goodstanding behind the action itself, this, I believe, is the
and evil? Wouldn't we have to look beyond social andtrue ground of evil -- the illusion of a separate self,
religious morays?standing apart from "God." Overcoming self is a
Sometimes good and evil set each other up. Whencommon theme in almost all religions.
good people think of ways to do nice things forIf you and I agree to something and one of us
other people, and when situations arise enabling themaccidentally violates our agreement, there is no evil
to carry out their missions, lust can arise in the formperformed, no intention, no self. However if I plot to
of an impulsive desire to do good. This is no differentdeceive you, then there is evil and there is a self
from any other dependency or addiction. Likewise,involved, as well as intention.
doing a good thing for somebody, or even having anSo the response usually is, "but how can wanting to
insight during deep prayer, can invite arrogance,help people, such as perhaps wanting the world to
smugness and conceit. Also, meditation ormeditate and pray, which is an intention, be a bad
contemplative prayer can lead to incredible calmthing?
states, which in turn can lead to a clinging to theWanting the world to conform to ideas or some
experience.religious structure would be an evil thing. That would
Desire, good or bad, leads to other things; this couldbe the epitome of evil. But merely seeing how we
be called cause and effect, and cause and effect canimprison ourselves, and seeing that the world is on
be intentional or unintentional. If we believe somethingfire is merely seeing, and not evil at all. If one sees
stands behind our actions, a "doer" of things, a "self,"this without intention, without any expectations or
then the actions become intentional -- we imaginedesire for results, and out of compassion makes that
ourselves being a good person or whatever. If thevision known with no thought of building a religious
actions are unintentional, then we do only whatstructure of any kind, allowing people to decide for
needs to be done.themselves what will truly free them -- is this
If we unintentionally do something, (not by accident,"intention," or is this an unintentional action that is as
but just do it spontaneously because action is callednatural as breathing?
for), that's much different from intentionally doing it.Christ and the Buddha made their insights known.
Unintentional actions usually don't involve good andThey didn't build a church or a religion -- followers did
evil, whereas intentional ones can. I believe that thesethat. Had the followers instead actually searched for
intentional "self" and unintentional "no-self" aspects oftruth in their hearts as their spiritual guides did, being
action are clues to fundamental good and evil, orpaupers and "non-religious," and seeing things as they
perhaps a better word for good and evil might be,were (that the Truth is a moving target and can't be
"what is." But without some actual experience ofharnessed into religious doctrines), perhaps we would
deep, contemplative prayer or meditation, this "nohave a world of prophets now instead of a world
self" thing is a difficult concept to understand.torn apart by beliefs.
Intention, or self, might be described as a taxi driver.The question is, how can we begin to become aware
The driver is "intention," and his taxicab, or his brain,and act out of that awareness, rather than acting
is the slave to that intention. The driver (intention)out of our past habit patterns? This, I believe, is a
tells the taxicab (brain) where to go, and in turn thecrucial point to consider.